Cite the paper
A. Zabolotin, A.V. Konovalov, A.A. Stepnov, A.S. Sychov, D.E. Tomilev (2016). Fluid Injection Induced Seismicity in the Oil and Gas Field Areas: Monitoring and Modelling. Mechanics, Materials Science & Engineering, Vol 4. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.5102.4249
Authors: A. Zabolotin, A.V. Konovalov, A.A. Stepnov, A.S. Sychov, D.E. Tomilev
ABSTRACT. Past experience has shown that injection-triggered seismicity is an extremely important phenomenon that must be considered when operation oil and gas fields. It is widely accepted that transmission of reservoir pore pressure through the faults, cracks and fractures is the main cause of stress transfer in the rock surrounding the fault zone. As a result, it provides an excessive stress accumulation within the fault zone that may lead to a failure. In order to estimate the excessive shear stress accumulation rate that may trigger the seismic activity according to the rate and state friction model we simulated a stress-strain process in a narrow fault zone between two units during the fluid injection into the one of the units in a simplified 2D model. The simulation is based on the theory of fluid-saturated poroelastic media. We considered the fault zone simulated by relatively higher permeability. The numerical calculations were performed using software libraries with the Freefem++ open code. Injection-triggered seismicity field study was made by the induced seismicity monitoring system in the Northern Sakhalin, Russia. The unusual swarm activity was registered in 2013-2016 in the vicinity of the fluid injection well and is discussed in this study.
Keywords: injection-triggered seismicity, 2D simulation, poroelastic media, oil & gas fields, faults
 V.V. Adushkin, S.B. Turuntaev, Technogenic seismicity – induced and triggered, Moscow nInstitute of Geosphere Dynamics RAS, 2015.
 A.A. Stepnov, A.V. Gavrilov, A.V. Konovalov, [et al.], L. New Architecture of an Automated System for Acquisition, Storage and Processing of Seismic Data. Seismic Instruments, 2014.
 D.F. Sumy [et al.], Observations of static Coulomb stress triggering of the November 2011 M5.7 Oklahoma earthquake sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2014.
 T. H. W. Goebel, S. M. Hosseini, F. Cappa, [et al.], Wastewater disposal and earthquake swarm activity at the southern end of the Central Valley, California. Geophys. Res. Lett, 2016. DOI:10.1002/2015GL066948.
 A. Helmstetter, B.E. Shaw, Afterslip and aftershocks in the rate-and-state friction low. J. Geophys. Res., 2009. DOI: 10.1029/2007JB005077.
 K. Katsumata, M. Kasahara, M. Ichiyanagi, [et al.] The 27 May 1995 MS 7.6 Northern Sakhalin earthquake: an earthquake on an uncertain plate boundary, Bul. Seis. Soc. Am., 2004.
 A.V. Konovalov, [et al.], Mw 5.6 Piltun Earthquake of June 12, 2005, and the Contemporary Seismicity in the Area of Oil-and-Gas Fields in the Northeastern Shelf of Sakhalin Island. Russ. J. Pac. Geol., 2015.
 N.F. Vasilenko, A.S. Prytkov, GPS-based modeling of the interaction between the lithospheric plates in Sakhalin, Russ. J. Pac. Geol., 2012.
 M.A. Biot, General theory of three-dimensional consolidation, J. Appl. Phys., 1941.
 J.R. Rice, M.P. Cleary, Some basic stress diffusion solutions for fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents, Review of Geophysics and Space Physics, 1976.
 E. Shalev, V. Lyakhovsky, The processes controlling damage zone propagation induced by wellbore fluid injection. Geophys. J. Int., 2013.
 V. Lyakhovsky, Y. Hamiel, Y. Ben-Zion, A non-local visco-elastic damage model and dynamic fractu ring. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2011.
 Y. Hamiel, V. Lyakhovsky, A. Agnon, Coupled evolution of damage and porosity in poroelastic media: theory and applications to deformation of porous rocks. Geophys. J. Int., 2004.
 Partial differential equation solver [http://www.freefem.org]
Mechanics, Materials Science & Engineering Journal by Magnolithe GmbH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at www.mmse.xyz.