Investigation of Energy Absorption in Aluminum Foam Sandwich Panels By Drop Hammer Test: Experimental Results

<- Back to II. Mechanical Engineering & Physics Vol. 7

Cite the paper

Mohammad Nouri Damghani, Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi (2016).Investigation of Energy Absorption in Aluminum Foam Sandwich Panels By Drop Hammer Test: Experimental Results. Mechanics, Materials Science & Engineering, Vol 7, pp. 123-141, doi:10.2412/mmse.6.953.525

Authors: Mohammad Nouri Damghani, Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi

ABSTRACT. The sandwich panel structures with aluminum foam core and metal surfaces have light weight with high performance in dispersing energy. This has led to their widespread use in the absorption of energy. The cell structure of foam core is subjected to plastic deformation in the constant tension level that absorbs a lot of kinetic energy before destruction of the structure. In this research, by making samples of aluminum foam core sandwich panels with aluminum surfaces, experimental tests of low velocity impact by a drop machine are performed for different velocities and weights of projectile on samples of sandwich panels with aluminum foam core with relative density of 18%, 23%, and 27%. The output of device is acceleration‐time diagram which is shown by an accelerometer located on the projectile. From the experimental tests, the effect of weight, velocity and energy of the projectile and density of the foam on the global deformation, and energy decrease rate of projectile have been studied. The results of the experimental testes show that by increasing the density of aluminum foam, the overall impression is reduced and the slop of energy loss of projectile increases. Also by increasing the velocity of the projectile, the energy loss increases.

Keywords: sandwich panel, metal foam, impact, energy absorption, drop hammer, dynamic load, experimental method

DOI 10.2412/mmse.6.953.525


[1] Zenkert D., 1995. An introduction to sandwich construction. Sheffield: Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd.

[2] Abrate S. 1998. Impact on composite structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3] Gibson L.J., Ashby M.F., 1997. Cellular solids: structure and properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[4] Ashby M.F., Evans A.G., Fleck N.A., et al., 2000. Metal foams: a design guide. Boston, MA: Butterworth Heinemann.

[5] Hazizan M.A., Cantwell WJ., 2003, The low velocity impact response of an aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure. Compos Part B, 34 (8), 679–687.

[6] Wen H.M., Reddy T.Y., Reid S.R., et al., 1997, Indentation, penetration and perforation of composite laminate and sandwich panels under quasi-static and projectile loading. Key Eng Mater, 141-143 (1), 501-552.

[7] Mines R.A.W., Worrall C.M., Gibson AG., 1998. Low velocity perforation behavior of polymer composite sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng, 21(10), 855-879.

[8] Abrate S., 1997. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev, 50(2), 69-82.

[9] Kiratisaevee H., Cantwell W.J., 2005. Low-velocity impact response of high-performance aluminum foam sandwich structures. J Reinf Plast Compos, 24(10), 1057-1072.

[10] Ruan D., Lu G., Wong Y.C., 2010. Quasi-static indentation tests on aluminum foam sandwich panels. Compos Struct, 92(9), 2039-2046.

[11] Villanueva G.R., Cantwell W.J., 2004. The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures. Compos Sci Technol, 64(1), 35-54.

[12] Hanssen A.G., Girard Y., Olovsson L., et al., 2006. A numerical model for bird strike of aluminum foam-based sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng, 32(7), 1127-1144.

[13] Zhao H., Elnasri I., Girard Y., 2007. Perforation of aluminum foam core sandwich panels under impact loading-an experimental study. Int J Impact Eng, 34(7), 1246-1257.

[14] Hou W., Zhu F., Lu G., et al., 2010. Ballistic impact experiments of metallic sandwich panels with aluminum foam core. Int J Impact Eng, 37(10), 1045-1055.

[15] Buitrago B.L., Santiuste C., Sanchez-Saez S., et al. 2010. Modelling of composite sandwich structures with honeycomb core subjected to high-velocity impact. Compos Struct, 92(9), 2090-2096.

[16] Ivanez I., Santiuste C., Barbero E., et al., 2011. Numerical modelling of foam-cored sandwich plates under high-velocity impact. Compos Struct, 93(9), 2392-2399.

[17] Yu J.L., Wang X., Wei Z.G., et al., 2003. Deformation and failure mechanism of dynamically loaded sandwich beams with aluminum-foam core. Int J Impact Eng, 28(3), 331-347.

[18] Bazant Z.P., Zhou Y., Daniel I.M., et al., 2006. Size effect on strength of laminate-foam sandwich plates. J Eng Mater Tech, 128(3), 366-374.

[19] Tekoglu C., Gibson L.J., Pardoen T., et al., 2011. Size effects in foams: experiments and model. ing Prog Mater Sci, 56(2), 109-138, doi 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.06.001


Creative Commons Licence
Mechanics, Materials Science & Engineering Journal by Magnolithe GmbH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at